Contact: Dean Jackson
Office of Public Information
Phone: 770.254.2736
Fax: 770.254.2807

Press Release
Coweta County Schools

Date: August 19, 2011
 

Charter School System or IE2 status to be considered by School Board over next two years

 

At the August meeting of the Coweta County Board of Education, Coweta County School System Director of Public Policy Mark Whitlock presented board members with an update of the school system’s preparation to move towards new and more flexible operations of the local school system, which are being allowed by the state of Georgia.

Whitlock has led the school system committee that will advise the superintendent and school board regarding the Coweta County School System becoming either an IE2 (“I.E.-squared’) or charter school system.

Whitlock reported on the results of focus groups and a community survey that have been conducted throughout 2011, and recommended that results be categorized into a number of broad school system goals that could form the basis for greater flexibility from current state rules regarding education. He also laid out a possible timeline for the school board’s decision in the coming years.

By 2015, all school systems in Georgia must choose between one of the three operational categories that will define their relationship to the state of Georgia. Those categories include Investing in Educational Excellence (IE2) legislation, or charter school system legislation, both of which allow school systems more local control regarding important education decisions and expenditures, and link accountability with increased flexibility. The other option is to remain a ‘status quo’ system, which offers little flexibility and innovation from current educational regulations.

The Coweta County Board of Education agreed last year to explore both the IE2 and Charter System options. These options would require that the local school district work with either or both the Georgia Department of Education and the Governor’s Office of Student Achievement to create a strategic plan that identifies the flexibility sought from Georgia education laws, accountability goals that the district is willing to accept at the school and system level in exchange for the flexibility, and other factors.

To determine what those areas of flexibility should be, Whitlock and other committee members conducted 17 focus groups during March and April, with approximately 250 participants, and conducted an online survey over the months of May and June, which gathered over 250 responses.

“The whole thrust of either IE2 or charter system is how you can use innovation to improve student achievement,” said Whitlock. “That is what we asked of participants – to present ideas for educational innovation that community stakeholders want to see, which will improve student achievement, to direct us in seeking the flexibility that we will need to seek” as the school system becomes either and IE2 or charter school system.

“In doing that, we had over 500 people in this community weigh in on their ideas for innovation that would help us maximize student achievement,” said Whitlock. “Those participants included parents, students, teachers, business partners, chamber board members, college faculty, school council members, school principals and counselors, and others,’ he said.

The committee recommended to the Board that the responses collected be organized into five broad innovation categories for the system (listed in order of priority):

• Preparation for Transition and Future World of Work—College/Career
• Technology Innovation
• Parent/Community Collaboration
• Maximizing Resources
• Continuous Improvement

Whitlock also said that the Georgia legislature has moved the deadline by which school systems must determine what kind of school system they will be, from 2013 to 2015.

“We suspect they did that in part because of anticipated changes to state and federal educational legislation,” he said.

“Governor Nathan Deal has created a finance study committee that may yield funding changes to the Quality Basic Education act,” which determines school funding and other educational regulations state-wide. “A similar committee commissioned by governor Perdue created the concept of IE2 systems to begin with, and created also the notion of ‘status quo’ school systems, and said each school system must have a strategic plan and pick among operating systems by 2013, now 2015.”

Federal No Child Left Behind legislation is also due to be reauthorized, Whitlock noted. “That law appears to sunset in its anticipated use by 2014,” he said. “We don’t know what form a new law might take, but we hear that there will be a broader focus on measures of student improvement – not just high stakes testing, but things like college and career readiness and student growth, versus just measuring student groups against each other.”

Because of those anticipated changes, Superintendent Steve Barker recommended to the School Board that they work towards a draft contract that could be developed and negotiated with state during 2012 and 2013, assuming that any anticipated state and federal changes have been realized and taken into account by the system’s plan.

The new contract could be implemented during the 2013-14 school year. That should give the school system time to take into account any changes to state and federal education legislation, align the data in detail within the five categories proposed, align the categories with SACS standards, and develop the specific state waivers required in order to implement the innovations requested in a school system contract.

“With all of this happening right now, we need to make sure we understand everything fully, before we move forward," said Superintendent Barker. “Once we know more about legislative changes at the state and federal level, we can begin to put student achievement measures into a contract and fully negotiate it.”

“If we tried now to put in student achievement measures and goals earlier than that date, those might be totally changed by the governor’s study committee or reauthorized No Child Left Behind legislation,” he said.

“There are some other advantages to that,” said Whitlock. “We’re a big system. We’re going to need to simulate some of that innovation to see the impact it will have on schools and departments. That’s an important opportunity this proposed timeline gives us.”
 

Close Window